Military domination and technological invention (guns and steel) are not the only measure of progress.It is perhaps a telling reflection of this flaw in Diamond’s argument that Eastern mysticism (including Zen Bhuddhism, Hatha Yoga, Tai Chi and other spiritual practices) are seeing newfound respect from Westerners.*The initial struggles of European population with epidemic diseases would prove to be an advantage later on, as they tuned their immune system to resist such germs.
Military domination and technological invention (guns and steel) are not the only measure of progress.Tags: Free Sample Business PlansOne Page Business Plan Jim HoranPost Thesis DepressionLap And Research PapersLast Day Of My College Life EssayEssay Referencing Apa
*And the greater variety of animal species in Europe made it possible to identify and tame suitable species to aid in agricultural production.
*The large landmass of Eurasia, as well as its long east-west spread made possible more plant and animal species for domestication.
In other words, while European colonizers looked upon indigenous people as primitive if not outright barbaric, the natives themselves never felt inferior.
Be it the British occupation of India or the French occupation of North Africa, colonialism was viewed by the locals as a form of oppression.
His indigenous New Guinean politician friend Yali asked why whites had been so successful and arrived with so much "cargo" compared to the locals.
JD rephrases this question: why did white Eurasians dominate over other cultures by means of superior guns, population-destroying germs, steel, and food-producing capability ?In many ways, Jared Diamond’s thesis can be said to reinforce Edward Said’s thesis called Orientalism, where the Middle and Far-Eastern civilizations are perceived as underdeveloped, exotic and mysterious despite no objective evidence to back the claim.The other problem with Diamond’s thesis is its narrow definition of progress and advancement.Such advantages were not present in the American or African landmasses, as geographic and ecological conditions did not present a consistent character across their length.*The aforementioned natural advantages in Eurasia, allowed and encouraged the formation of city civilizations, where society could be systematically organized and people could specialize in crafts and skills.*The close proximity of urban civil arrangements made exchange of information easier.On the flip side, the congested accommodations in ancient cities made the population susceptible to epidemic attacks.*One of the turning points that ushered in progress of human civilization was agriculture.Agriculture was directly responsible for the development of cities as surplus food afforded people the time to specialize in various crafts.There is much evidence to support the central thesis of the documentary, in that Europeans have excelled in domains of technology, medicine, art and architecture for much of recent human history.But this view comes across as simplistic and Euro-centric in that it does not take into account the notion of cultural relativity.